Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Movie Review Monday: The Perfect Host



Mike Finkelstein is having a dinner party.  His friends are very strange, and he has an affinity for makeup.  You don’t want to be around when everything goes down.  Here is his review for “The Perfect Host”.

PLOT: John Taylor (Clayne Crawford) is a career criminal on the run after his most recent bank robbery.  When he tries to hide out at the house of Warwick Wilson (David Hyde Pierce), a seemingly gentle soul, it turns out he gets a lot more than he bargained for.

Check out the trailer:

MIKE’S REVIEW:  After watching the above trailer for THE PERFECT HOST the first time, I was…very intrigued.

Okay…let’s be honest…I was going “What the F*** was that?!?”

The film looked completely warped and twisted, David Hyde Pearce is in a role on the opposite side of the spectrum of Niles Crane and Broadway, and you have no idea where the hell everything could go.  Yay, right?  If only the speeding train didn’t have to fly off the tracks…

THE PERFECT HOST starts out on a beautiful high note.  Within the opening credits, we feel the ooze of Hitchcock in the shots and title cards, while the Eagles of Death Metal’s “Wannabe in LA” gives it that little extra flavoring of today.  John is desperately trying to find a safe haven, and we are hanging on a wire as we try to figure out how to feel toward him.  Then we meet Warwick, and we decide all we want is this horrible criminal to leave without causing any harm to our nice geeky friend who’s having a dinner party.

Heh…if only…

As you saw above, all hell breaks loose.  Warwick is absolutely insane, and suddenly, we just want this horrible, crazy freak of a person to not cause any harm to our nice little criminal friend with a heart.  Bit of a twist, no?

For the first two thirds of the film, this insecurity of character is what drives us forward.  We have no idea where anything is going or what either of these two men is capable of, and the tension builds.  David Hyde Pierce is cruel, perverted, and just plain malicious as Warwick.  (At one point, he does something concerning a “piece of ass” that I never thought I’d ever see Niles Crane do…)  He proved with this role that he could play against type wonderfully, and I hope we get to see some other sides of him soon.  At the same time, Clayne Crawford plays the multi-layered John Taylor with vigor.  At first, he is scum to us, yet slowly, he turns to our golden boy, and you could see his conflicted mind moving rapidly the whole time.

With all that said, where there are two thirds, there has to be a final third, and that is where everything goes wrong.  Suddenly, the twists and turns become manic and overused.  Around every corner, there is a new detail that wasn’t revealed two minutes earlier, and it becomes more and more ridiculous to the point where you want to throw your metaphorical towel into the ring and yell “I give up!”  By the end of the film, you sadly almost feel like you’re watching a completely different movie. The characters don’t resemble themselves (especially Warwick), and we are in a different world entirely.

This is Nick Tomney’s first feature film, based on his short, “The Host.”  As a director, he does a pretty damn good job of putting his story together here, however, as a writer, he just tried too hard to push the limits.  I’m very curious how he left the audience with the short.  Was the mess of a final third also there?  Was there a different ending entirely?  Did it play better?  While I have to give him a lot of credit for both writing and directing, I feel like with a little more structure and another direction at the end, this could have been a psychological thriller cult classic.

THE PERFECT HOST starts off as one of the most original and intriguing films I’ve seen in a while.  David Hyde Pierce and Clayne Crawford play a constant game of wolf and sheep, and every second, the roles reverse.  Nick Tomney’s first feature could have been a cult classic, if only he hadn’t tried so hard to outdo himself in the end.  Instead, the film in my mind leaves the memory of a basic thriller that had so much potential for more.

Although, I have to admit the last shot we see of Warwick is pretty badass…


Mike’s LIKES:

1) DAVID HYDE PIERCE: The man plays a role on the opposite side of the spectrum from Niles Crane, and does it beautifully.  He is malicious and evil without Daphne, and I’m very impressed.

2) HITCHCOCK VIBES: Tomney has Hitchcock shining through during the first hour of the film.  Put it in black and white, and on the shelf next to something starring Cary Grant or Jimmy Stewart.


1) FLIES OFF THE RAILS IN THE THIRD ACT:  I don’t know what happened, but in the final act, we get thrown for a loop, into a world that only vaguely resembles everything we’ve seen before it.  So disappointing to see a house of cards fall apart like that.


1) The tattoo on John’s hand contains three Hebrew letters: the initials for “Ura Riva Yerivi”, which means absolute certainty.


REVIEW: “Sing Street” Will Put a Song in Your Heart… and Your iPod



“I have just seen an instant classic.”

That’s what I said to myself as I left the theater, with the music and adrenaline of “Sing Street” still coursing through my veins.

It’s the kind of movie you want to turn around and see again, immediately. Right after you download the soundtrack. Yes, it’s that good.

Haven’t heard anything about it? I’m not surprised. I wouldn’t have known about this film either, except that my Regal Crown Club card finally paid off in the form of free tickets to an advanced screening. (Never mind the $25 popcorn.) Anyway, let’s watch!

Hooked yet? You will be.

Irish writer/director John Carney (“Once,” “Begin Again”) has conjured a nearly perfect coming-of-age tale set in 1980s Dublin. Think “The Commitments meets “Sixteen Candles meets “Footloose,” but all in one glorious package that manages to be both fresh and nostalgic at the same time. Drawing from his own teenage years at the real Synge Street school, Carney avoids the trap of creating a pure fluff piece by infusing the story with real heart.

A large part of that is due to the breakout talent and hero of Sing Street,” 16-year-old Ferdia Walsh-Peelo. As “Connor Lalor” navigates the tricky currents of a new school, family drama, and first love, Walsh-Peelo is heartbreakingly earnest, predictably awkward, and unexpectedly optimistic. Everything about his performance rings true. No small feat, considering that this is his acting debut.

Thanks to Carney’s non-actor, open casting approach, Walsh-Peelo is also joined by some equally promising new faces. Lucy Boynton is luminous as his love interest, “Raphina,” and Mark McKenna is quietly compelling as Conor’s songwriting partner, “Eamon.”

One of the most satisfying pairings, though, is anchored by the more experienced Jack Reynor (“Transformers:Age of Extinction”).  He shines as Conor’s older brother, “Brendan.”  Dealing with the angst of his own stalled dreams, Brendan tackles his brotherly mentoring role with gusto. Conor soaks up the advice like a ruddy-cheeked sponge, then begins to find his own way as his confidence grows.  Rarely do we see the underlying affection between two brothers played so simply and honestly,  so the relationship between Conor and Brendan is a lovely surprise.

The other undeniable star of “Sing Street” is the music.  While the story could have easily been told with the band only performing covers of ’80s hits,  Carney had a bigger vision for the film.  He collaborated with Scottish songwriter Gary Clark to craft 8 original tunes that not only add layers of light and shade to the storyline, but could be stand-alone chart toppers today.  From the gleefully retro “The Riddle of the Model,” to the Cure-tastic “Beautiful Sea,”  to the EMO ballad “To Find You,”  there’s something for everyone. Welcome to your summer soundtrack, people.

There are few darker notes to the plot, and the ending feels slightly of place, but in general “Sing Street” will leave you feeling as light and fizzy as a packet of Pop Rocks.

The movie poster reads: “Boy Meets Girl. Girl Unimpressed. Boy Starts Band.”  That’s it in a nutshell, of course, but happily, this film is so much more.

SING STREET opens in New York April 15th, and is in theaters nationwide on April 29th.






Continue Reading


Celebrate The Fourth With Our Picks For Great American Movies!

What makes a film distinctly American? Sometimes it recollects the spirit of our patriotism, and other times it is so iconic and popular that it defines an entire generation of our culture. Here are our picks for some great American movies! Why not celebrate your Independence Day holiday by popping up some popcorn and enjoying one?



What makes a film distinctly American? Sometimes it recollects the spirit of our patriotism, and other times it is so iconic and popular that it defines an entire generation of our culture. Here are our picks for some great American movies! Why not celebrate your Independence Day holiday by popping up some popcorn and enjoying one?

It’s impossible to list them all… this is just a handfull! Scroll down and tell us what your favorites are!!!

Let’s start at the beginning!

Do you have what it takes to watch a black and white classic? (Don’t break my heart by replying if the answer is no.) Yankee Doodle Dandy is a 1942 classic starring James Cagney – telling the story of the great entertainer George M Cohan. He’s the man behind the songs “The Yankee Doodle Boy” and “You’re a Grand Old Flag.”  A true classic with distinctly American music and showmanship. Watch the trailer!

There’s something about the fifties and sixties that still plucks at the nostalgic heartstrings of America. And yet, two of the most iconic movies about that period were actually shot decades later, with a heartfelt look back at those times.

Both American Graffiti and Grease come to mind. While American Graffiti can take bragging rights for bringing us more breakout stars, (and being written and directed by George Lucas), Grease seems to enjoy more clout as a family friendly favorite.

1986 was a  good year for Tom Cruise, and a good year for movies. Top Gun starred Tom Cruise stars as a student at Top Gun Naval Academy. It sparked a sense of patriotism, and the continued ascent of Cruise’s career. (If you’re watching with your kids, you might wanna skip ahead once you start hearing the song “Take My Breath Away.” Love scene ahead! Still, some might argue it’s pretty tame by today’s standards.)

Forrest Gump (1994) proved not only to be an excellent movie, but also an impromptu history lesson.
The story follows an unlikely hero (played by Tom Hanks) as he journeys through life, finding himself witnessing (and sometimes even influencing) a series of historic events, but is largely unaware of their significance. A true classic.

Before the luster of Mel Gibson had worn off, he portrayed Benjamin Martin, a man who becomes embroiled in the Revolutionary War. The late Heath Ledger plays his son, who fights in the Continental Army.

The most recent of patriotic classics is 2012’s Lincoln. Daniel Day Lewis delivers a flawless performance as our 16th President under the directorial brilliance of Steven Spielberg. A new classic for the ages.


For more movies updates, follow @BrianBalthazar on twitter!

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

MOVIE REVIEW- WORLD WAR Z Is a Messy, Relentless Zombie Horror Flick That Really Works

Check Out Steven’s review for one of the biggest surprises of 2013, the epic zombie flick WORLD WAR Z.



world-war-z-posterWORLD WAR Z

Paramount Pictures

Director- Marc Forster

Starring-Brad Pitt, Mireille Enos, James Badge Dale. Abigail Hargrove, Sterling Jerins, David Morse, David Andrews.

Steven’s Quick Review- Yes its production was messy, but WORLD WAR Z might be the biggest surprise of the summer movies in 2013. Thanks to relentless action, a number of good scares, and an on-target performance from Brad Pitt, WORLD WAR Z is an excellent zombie film. Even though it is barely based on its source material, Damon Lindelof’s rewritten third act will keep audiences guessing and add some scares to your summer movie slate.

Steven’s Review- Brad Pitt has become the kind of actor who now only does movies he truly wants to do, and only takes roles that challenge him. So when Pitt and his Plan B studios initially won the rights to Max Brooks bestselling novel WORLD WAR Z the options were endless. Yet from the start of production the movie had issues, between the initial script lacking invention, a director in Marc Forster (QUANTUM OF SOLACE) who was found it difficult to make important decisions and the very public spat between Pitt and Forster that nearly sidelined the film indefinitely.  There were also the on-set issues, besides the arguments between the actor and director, there were problems on set in Hungary when government officials stormed the set and removed live weapons. Also, forced re-shoots that moved WWZ from a winter release to a summer tentpole. It’s easy to assume WORLD WAR Z was doomed from the start. But something happened along the way, something that shocked plenty during our screening of the film in May. Despite all the evidence to the contrary, Pitt, Forster, and crew actually made a darn good zombie flick. With help from Damon Lindelof (“Lost”, STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS) who came to the rescue and reworked an ending  after the studio deemed the initial conclusion was not good enough for release.  Following Lindelof’s changes and a massive marketing campaign Brad Pitt’s newest pet project was ready to show the world.

WORLD WAR Z the book takes place in a post zombie war setting, when a journalist and U.N investigator goes all over the globe talking to survivors and getting their stories.  The film adaptation written by Drew Goddard (CABIN IN THE WOODS), Matthew Michael Carnahan (STATE OF PLAY), J. Michael Straczynski (THOR) and Damon Lindelof  has little to nothing to do with Brooks acclaimed novel. We begin meeting Gerry Lane(Pitt) , a former UN investigator who lives with his family somewhere outside Philadelphia.  Within 5 minutes of the opening credits, we are thrown into a full on zombie invasion, with riots in super markets and speedy zombies chasing people down. WWZ Starts off with a bang. Gerry’s wife Karin(“The Killings” Mireille Enos), and his daughters Constance(Sterling Jerins) and Rachel (Abigail Hargrove) desperately leave the city and head towards New York, finding themselves in the streets of  Newark, New Jersey where they pick up supplies and await a helicopter pick-up thanks to Gerry’s old friends at the United Nations.

WORLD WAR Z is in no way a perfect movie; every now and then it finds itself deep into horror cliché, only to drag itself out with one big sequence after another. Pitt carries the film as he finds himself in worse situations every moment, but without being totally indestructible (meaning as an audience you never quite know whether Gerry Lane will make it out alive). Pitt’s performance feels dressed in reality, while he searches the globe for reasons why this zombie apocalypse is happening, worries for his safety and hopes to return to his family.

WORLD WAR Z is a suspenseful zombie flick that contains a few scares, but has the advantage of almost never slowing down.  The filmmakers found a way to protray a lot of violence and still receive a PG-13 rating – they show you enough death and destruction without maimed bodies and severed limbs. I enjoyed the fast paced nature of WWZ and the fact it never drags, it allows characters to develop and story to move forward without forsaking the zombie action fan in all of us.

As far as adaptations go, WORLD WAR Z could be considered one of the worst, it barely contains any connection to Max Brooks brilliant novel, other than a few characters names and one or two plot points. As far as summer surprises, WORLD WAR Z is a welcome break from comedies and super hero flicks that take up most of our time. But the pressure is on: it needs to bring in $500 million dollars to turn a profit for everyone involved. I enjoyed WORLD WAR Z and hope they can find a way to make some cash, so we can get more zombie action just like it.

Continue Reading